Search for: "John Doe Goodwill"
Results 1 - 20
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
John Does 1-5U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:36 am
John Does 1-50United States District Court for N.D. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:10 pm
A person simply doing business does not, by itself, qualify. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:14 am
If so, what does “non-actual” goodwill entail? [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:59 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:23 am
The finding of a likelihood of confusion does not depend upon whether the plaintiff enjoyed goodwill or mere reputation. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:13 am
John B. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
The Court of Appeal (through Sir John Mummery) essentially agreed with Arnold J. and dismissed the appeal. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:55 am
The copy may well be cheaper but that also does not increase choice of price. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 1:44 pm
The Frommer's name and goodwill merged with the reliable Frommer's content. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
And third, it does not preclude use of a liquidated damages provision. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:59 pm
JOHN LUONGO, Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
It rejected the Article 6bis claim, concluding that Article 6bis does not create a right of action outside the Lanham Act. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:19 am
[A claimant in a passing off claim had to establish that it had actual goodwill in the jurisdiction and that such goodwill involved the presence of clients or customers in the jurisdiction for the products or services in question. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:37 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 9:54 am
"Two anonymous plaintiffs are suing 20th Century Fox and One America Productions, claiming members of their college fraternity were interviewed to become part of the smash "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan" film.The plaintiffs -- listed as John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 -- were allegedly assured the film would not be shown in the U.S. and their identities would not be revealed. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm
It does seem, after all, that Belmora is indeed leveraging the goodwill of Mexico’s Flanax — which probably really, in some ethereal way not amenable to regular old proof of “trademark use” — does exist north of the border, in order to pull a fast one on Mexican visitors to the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:03 am
Maybe the decision breaks no new ground, but the opinion is an impressive review of dilution law.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:20 am
(TM) Text Copyright John L. [read post]
